In a scathing rebuke to Patanjali founders Ramdev and Balkrishna, the Supreme Court has firmly rejected their latest apologies over misleading advertisements. In a hearing today, the apex court expressed dissatisfaction with the apologies filed by the duo, stating, “we are not blind” and “it does not want to be generous” in this matter. The court underscored that the apologies appeared to be mere lip service, highlighting a deliberate violation of undertaken commitments.
The bench, comprising Justice Hima Kohli and Justice A. Amanullah, did not mince words in their criticism. They noted with dismay that the apologies were initially released to the media before reaching the court, indicating a preference for publicity over genuine remorse. “Till the matter hit the court, the contemnors did not find it fit to send us the affidavits. They sent it to the media first, till 7.30 pm yesterday it was not uploaded for us. They believe in publicity clearly,” remarked Justice Kohli.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Patanjali founders, faced sharp questioning from the bench as he read out the apologies. Justice Amanullah questioned the sincerity of the apologies, remarking, “You are defrauding the affidavit. Who drafted it, I am surprised.” Despite Rohatgi’s assertion that the apologies were genuine and heartfelt, the court remained unconvinced, emphasizing the need for accountability and consequences for violating court orders.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court criticized the Uttarakhand licensing authority for its inaction against Patanjali, despite repeated violations. The court demanded the suspension of three officers for their failure to enforce regulations. It lambasted the authority for its complacency, stating, “We have strong objection to the use of the word ‘bonafide’ for officers. We are not going to take it lightly. We will rip you apart.”
The bench also condemned the licensing authority’s negligence in addressing misleading advertisements, highlighting the potential harm caused to consumers. “What about all the faceless people who have consumed these Patanjali medicines stated to cure diseases which cannot be cured. Can you do this to an ordinary person?” the court questioned.
In response to the court’s criticism, the Uttarakhand licensing authority apologized and pledged to take action against Patanjali. However, the court remained skeptical, questioning the authority’s integrity and suggesting collusion with the company.
The Supreme Court’s stern stance sends a clear message that corporate entities cannot flout regulations with impunity. As the proceedings continue, all eyes are on the court’s impending decision regarding Ramdev and Balkrishna, scheduled for April 16th.
