The Supreme Court has finally settled the long-debated question of whether passing the Teachers’ Eligibility Test (TET) is necessary for both aspiring and in-service teachers. In its ruling under the Right to Education Act, the Court made it clear that TET is compulsory not only for new candidates but also for serving teachers seeking promotion.
A division bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Manmohan underlined that without clearing TET, no candidate—whether fresh or in-service—can claim the right to be considered for appointment or promotion. The ruling reinforces TET as the minimum benchmark for teaching posts across the country.
Rule for In-Service Teachers
The Court laid down a clear framework for serving teachers. Those who have more than five years of service left must clear the TET within two years. Failing to do so will result in compulsory retirement. However, such teachers will still be entitled to their terminal benefits if they meet eligibility norms.
Relief for Senior Teachers
Acknowledging the challenges faced by teachers nearing retirement, the Court invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution. Teachers with less than five years of service remaining will not be required to clear TET, unless they are aspiring for a promotion. This relaxation has been seen as a balanced move, protecting senior educators while maintaining standards for the system at large.
Impact on Education Policy
The ruling underscores the Court’s firm stance on maintaining teaching quality and accountability. It is expected to reshape recruitment and promotion policies across states, compelling education departments to strictly enforce TET compliance. Experts believe the judgment will strengthen the Right to Education Act’s mandate of ensuring qualified and competent teachers in classrooms.
